Tinarie van Wyk Loots (Cleopatra) and Andre Weideman (Antony)

Tinarie van Wyk Loots (Cleopatra) and Andre Weideman (Antony)

Clinton Brown (an eunuch) Tinarie van Wyk Loots (Cleopatra) Andre Weideman (Antony)

Clinton Brown (an eunuch) Tinarie van Wyk Loots (Cleopatra) Andre Weideman (Antony)

Maynardville’s beautiful outdoor venue – a picnic followed by what is on a balance a perfectly acceptable production, although it doesn’t quite achieve what the director appears to have desired, makes this worth the excursion.

As Barrack Obama seems fatefully bent to prove, we can no longer it seems believe in heroic leaders. The best we can do these days is sigh with resignation that someone not sinister or at best less competent is (for a while at least) not the figurehead of our world or country. It is with this in mind that Marthinus Basson’s production of Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra strikes one as a thoroughly modern reading of the play. The eponymous couple and their rival are more ruinously self-centred and less ennobled than ever.

His mellifluous voice lends dignity, but André Weideman’s Antony is otherwise a slouching and frequently boorish soldier; Tinarie van Wyk Loots’s brattish Cleopatra pretends at any rate to be enthralled by him pawing her; while Andrew Laubscher’s petulant Octavius Caesar overplays the hissy-fits and undercuts Shakespeare’s carefully laid antithesis of rule by the mind and not the passions. Despite his shrillness, his Caesar is at times quaintly menacing.

Instead, the supporting cast, particularly Lionel Newton as Enobarbus (one should also mention for her solid performance Juliet Jenkin as Charmain) takes the foreground. It is not quite what we have come to expect from a Marthinus Basson production, but then Basson has uncharacteristically chosen to abandon high concept, and “to explore the spaces between the fault-lines of the epic sweep and drama”. This is one of Shakespeare’s more difficult works. Its past success has usually been in playing up its Hollywood values.

The risky downside is that the play cannot be entirely freed from its melodrama and with it our preconditioned expectations, unless the cast can give studied character portrayals and the director aim for intimacy. Newton comes closest, but overall the performances, although competent, are too middling. Yet there are moments when the production more than rises to the challenge: for instance a radical reinterpretation of Act 3 Scene 6, having Caesar show heartless cruelty to his sister. Here Basson’s modern reading and his staging comes together brilliantly.

Basson has neat choreographic ideas, and the set with upright red lightsticks for Rome and golden rays for Egypt is effective. Neat too is the introduction of live snakes, handled by a soothsayer with an accent as slippery, and mesmerizing the audience. The young ensemble have grown facial hair, and this helps them with their soldierly appearance. Basson also has fun with costumes; Cleopatra’s ceremonial dress makes her resemble a large golden insect; her war helmet transforms her into some macrocephalic alien from Star Trek.
Go see.

Cowboy Mouth

Sam Shepard wrote Cowboy Mouth (1971) with Patti Smith while they were having an affair during his prolific and manic early years in the East Village when he was part of the off-off Broadway scene. Shepard has described his one-act plays of this period as “impulsive chronicles”, “slightly embarrassing” with hindsight, but unapologetically churned out while “learning how to write”.

Surprising then that despite it being belaboured with private symbolism for Shepard and Smith, how enduring is its energy, and how easily each subsequent generation identifies with this angst-ridden, graffiti script and its discombobulated protagonists. This time around, it speaks thanks to good performances, but mostly to Christopher Weare’s lucid and coherent design and direction.

In the twilight zone of a detritus ridden room, Slim (Nicholas Pauling at his best), a downtrodden, volatile, would-be rock star, oscillates between worshipping and cursing his mistress and co-habitant Cavale (Tinarie Van Wyk Loots), an ugly duckling outpatient from a mental asylum with a club foot and a crow for a pet. Their frustrated aspiration for fame and fortune and their failure to find messianic redemption through rock ’n roll or some mythic figure such as Jim Morrison’s Lizard King, inevitably prefigures the calamity of their relationship.

Philosophically flimsy and intellectually unsatisfying, the play nevertheless succeeds with sinuous dialogue and poetry as powerful as the disembodied imagery of its title (borrowed from Bob Dylan). The project continues for each successive generation to create a God in their image.

doubt

Unfortunately, this production of John Patrick Shanley’s Doubt makes you wonder what all the fuss is about. A Pulitzer Prize play (2005), a veteran director and a cast that includes two of our finest actors, yet where was the ‘high drama’, the ‘mesmerizing’, ‘enthralling’, ‘gripping mystery’, as declared by every critic from the The New York Times to the Wall Street Journal? Perhaps expectations were raised too high; perhaps it was a premature opening night, but no one can seriously claim it had ‘the audience gasping’.

Set in the Bronx in 1964 in a Catholic school serving the Italian and Irish communities, the only black student (who we never meet) is dismissed from altar duty for drinking wine. The strict, disciplinarian principal Sister Aloysius (Sandra Prinsloo) has her suspicions raised by Sister James (Tinarie van Wyk Loots) that Father Flynn (Jeremy Crutchley) is a paedophile and was seducing this twelve-year old boy. Convinced, but without clear evidence, she proceeds against Flynn. As she puts it, in the pursuit against wrongdoing one takes a step away from God but in his service. As the script has it, we are never sure whether the real struggle is within the church itself – her actual motivation being to counter the priest’s modernising liberal influence. Certainty, we are told, is only an emotion.

For the script to work dramatically, we as audience have to constantly second-guess ourselves. The problem is that Prinsloo’s gravity trumps Crutchley’s airiness. You almost never doubt Sister Aloysius. Crutchley on the other hand exudes guilt. When at the end of the play Sister Aloysius declares how full of doubts she is, it comes as an unexpected and unsuccessful twist.

A faltering pace, stilted exchanges and static blocking, had the audience applauding the penultimate scene, mistaking it for the ending. Competence, even proficiency, but without flair, allows the drama to lapse into debate theatre. The clues in the script to the character of Sister James are not remotely matched by Van Wyk Loot’s reading of the part. Ilse Oppelt, who appears for one scene as the boy’s mother, was a welcome relief, picking up the pace, though the role of her character is deeply flawed. Accents shifted from American to Irish to South African. In fact, the leads were at their best when their accents did slip.