I Claudia

When she was still based in Canada, actress Susan Danford saw Kristen Thomson’s debut play, I, Claudia. The impression this one-woman play made has led Danford to stage its South African premiere.

Claudia is twelve and well beyond her years intellectually. Her parents are divorcing. Her father is remarrying – to a woman portrayed as a slapper, after an engagement that Claudia shatteringly discovers had an unsavoury start.

This domestic drama is related through well crafted, pithy and often comic monologues from four characters – Claudia, her ailing grandfather, Lesley the fiancée, and the school caretaker – an emigrant director from an imaginary country in Eastern Europe, each with their own stylized and slightly creepy mask.

One of our finest actors, Danford switches roles with style and ease. The masks, which are made to Danford’s face and although indelibly striking and adding theatricality, after a while feel to one to be more barrier than supportive device. Young Claudia is putting on a brave face as it were, but her addresses to us are in confidence and in the privacy of the boiler room where she hides out.

There isn’t much momentum to drive the piece, but Thomson convincingly enters the mind of a precocious adolescent and she gives each of her characters pathos and clarity.

In a society with high divorce rates, Claudia will resonate widely with local audiences and the masks are sure to intrigue.

Andrew Buckland Susan Danford Jeremy Crutchley
When the baker’s wife is unfaithful with a prince in Sondheim’s Into the Woods, she sings some of his cleverest lyrics: “There are vows, there are ties, there are standards, there are needs, there are shouldn’ts and shoulds. Why not both instead? There’s the answer if you’re clever. Have a child for warmth and a baker for bread and a prince for whatever.”

In Harold Pinter’s Betrayal Robert (Andrew Buckland) has affairs, but is married with two children. So is his best friend Jerry (Jeremy Crutchley). Yet Jerry is also having an affair with Robert’s wife – Emma (Susan Danford). Like the baker’s wife we wonder, “Must it always be either less or more, either plain or grand, is it always ‘or’, is it never ‘and’?” Yet this isn’t a moment in the woods, they’ve been at it for seven years, even sharing a flat. Nor is it a secret. At a certain point in time, everyone knows, but not everyone knows who knows.

Echoing conventional morality, the baker’s wife concludes, “Just remember when you’ve had and ‘and’, when you’re back to ‘or’, makes the ‘or’ mean more than it did before”. Pinter is not convinced. Instead, he acknowledges how people manage the tensions around emotional security and romantic yearnings. There is no terrifying climax, no make or break confrontation. Not that there isn’t pain, jealousy, loss and anger, but when everyone is guilty of some betrayal, it almost ceases to be an accusation.

Director Lara Foot Newton has chosen shrewdly for a public largely unfamiliar with Pinter’s extensive oeuvre. Written with the clarity of a surgical light, it is today as relevant as it was in 1978.

Newton has hand-picked what is a dream cast. Buckland is subtlety personified, perfect for a sly comedy in which we laugh silently, inwardly. He could be purged of some British intonations that have become over-familiarly associated with Monty Python, but that might be part of his performance’s appeal. Audiences may need clues to the comedy. As passionate lovers, Crutchley and Danford, are an ideal match. We’re fortunate to have them both permanently back in South Africa. Together with Mannie Manim’s sensitive lighting, Patrick Curtis’s muted modern grey set is the perfect canvas for these sterling performances. Newton has allowed the work to breathe and seen to it that none of Pinter’s delicacy goes astray.