Tinarie van Wyk Loots (Cleopatra) and Andre Weideman (Antony)

Tinarie van Wyk Loots (Cleopatra) and Andre Weideman (Antony)

Clinton Brown (an eunuch) Tinarie van Wyk Loots (Cleopatra) Andre Weideman (Antony)

Clinton Brown (an eunuch) Tinarie van Wyk Loots (Cleopatra) Andre Weideman (Antony)

Maynardville’s beautiful outdoor venue – a picnic followed by what is on a balance a perfectly acceptable production, although it doesn’t quite achieve what the director appears to have desired, makes this worth the excursion.

As Barrack Obama seems fatefully bent to prove, we can no longer it seems believe in heroic leaders. The best we can do these days is sigh with resignation that someone not sinister or at best less competent is (for a while at least) not the figurehead of our world or country. It is with this in mind that Marthinus Basson’s production of Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra strikes one as a thoroughly modern reading of the play. The eponymous couple and their rival are more ruinously self-centred and less ennobled than ever.

His mellifluous voice lends dignity, but André Weideman’s Antony is otherwise a slouching and frequently boorish soldier; Tinarie van Wyk Loots’s brattish Cleopatra pretends at any rate to be enthralled by him pawing her; while Andrew Laubscher’s petulant Octavius Caesar overplays the hissy-fits and undercuts Shakespeare’s carefully laid antithesis of rule by the mind and not the passions. Despite his shrillness, his Caesar is at times quaintly menacing.

Instead, the supporting cast, particularly Lionel Newton as Enobarbus (one should also mention for her solid performance Juliet Jenkin as Charmain) takes the foreground. It is not quite what we have come to expect from a Marthinus Basson production, but then Basson has uncharacteristically chosen to abandon high concept, and “to explore the spaces between the fault-lines of the epic sweep and drama”. This is one of Shakespeare’s more difficult works. Its past success has usually been in playing up its Hollywood values.

The risky downside is that the play cannot be entirely freed from its melodrama and with it our preconditioned expectations, unless the cast can give studied character portrayals and the director aim for intimacy. Newton comes closest, but overall the performances, although competent, are too middling. Yet there are moments when the production more than rises to the challenge: for instance a radical reinterpretation of Act 3 Scene 6, having Caesar show heartless cruelty to his sister. Here Basson’s modern reading and his staging comes together brilliantly.

Basson has neat choreographic ideas, and the set with upright red lightsticks for Rome and golden rays for Egypt is effective. Neat too is the introduction of live snakes, handled by a soothsayer with an accent as slippery, and mesmerizing the audience. The young ensemble have grown facial hair, and this helps them with their soldierly appearance. Basson also has fun with costumes; Cleopatra’s ceremonial dress makes her resemble a large golden insect; her war helmet transforms her into some macrocephalic alien from Star Trek.
Go see.

Photo : Giovanni Sterelli.

Photo : Giovanni Sterelli.


After a bad start, this year’s Artscape Spring Drama Season of fully staged new South African plays concludes on a slightly better note with The Return by Fatima Dike. It is of course not unusual for a series of fresh works to have few successes. Even experienced outfits such as the National Theatre Studio go hopelessly wrong. But the problem locally is that the script mentoring process, which the Artscape New Writing Programme promises, is sadly not doing a good enough job. The works go to stage premature and obviously so.

In this critic’s opinion of the fifteen productions over the past four years only Beethoven in Raptus (written in 1981), Juliet Jenkin’s The Boy Who Fell from the Roof and Graham Weir’s Circus Sideshow are of note.

The season commenced with Dalliances. Not even innovative direction could rescue this one. A ludicrous plot, tissue-thin characters and dialogue riddled with clichés, this was an exercise in popular titillation as vacuous at the culture it pretended to anatomize.

It was followed by Wrestlers. Playwright Milton Schorr is an original thinker, but someone needed to point out the old adage that naturalistic dialogue is the way people speak but with all the boring bits cut out. The trivial did not become more meaningful.

The Return covers well trodden ground, constructing the barest of excuses for delivering cultural notes (greatly enjoyed by the American exchange students on the night I attended).

Overall, the playwrights have a weak sense of the theatrical. Plays are not television episodes on stage, where soap opera formats dominate and psychobabble substitutes for characterisation. The mentors need to be tougher and the playwrights will have to demonstrate greater commitment to their art. Premature professional stagings help neither. Let’s hold thumbs for 2009.

Photo: Guy de Lancey

Photo: Guy de Lancey


Venom is a good comeback for young playwright Juliet Jenkin, who after her magnificent success with The Boy Who Fell from the Roof dipped somewhat with the rather dull Library. In Venom she returns to the scenario of unrequited physical intimacy between dominant, articulate girl and troubled boy, and to sketching eccentric characters that delight audiences with their quirky digressions about life.

This time Jenkin ventures into darker emotional waters. Gabriel (Nicholas Dallas) is a dysfunctional young man and borderline schizophrenic menaced by paranoid visions of a snake-like thing. His girl friend Zann (Jenkin) plays along, singing to calm him and nurture him through his psychosis (perhaps in the faith that R D Laing’s theory is correct and he’ll recuperate by himself). How life pushed Gabriel over the edge we realize early on is the revelation that will be manufactured for the climax of the play.

As an actor Dallas possesses exactly the right sensitivity to match his character’s vulnerability and he delivers a nuanced and very fine performance. As the author, Jenkin is perfectly at home in the role of Zann.

Despite its numerous strengths, its originality, Jenkin’s intelligent observations and off-beat humour, one is however left with an incomplete feeling, the kind of simultaneous relief and disappointment one experiences when after having lit all the candles and settled down, the electricity comes back on. The political commentary which is expressed as a sort of crude diagnosis is at the nub of the problem. Gabriel worries that he might be becoming a white supremacist. But what Jenkin doesn’t resolve convincingly yet wishes to convey is how her characters’ inner turmoil reflect the social undercurrents at large.