HOOT

Most white South Africans are oblivious to the enormous hurdles and daily dangers faced in simply trying to make ends meet if you’re a black taxi driver. Cushioned with credit and the systemic privileges inherited from racial capitalism, many whites remain alienated from the lower classes overwhelmingly constituted by people formerly classified under apartheid as non-white. These seemingly intractable divisions the boyish Matthew Ribnick, whose break-through came with The Chilli Boy, relishes and exploits with humour in Hoot.

Ribnick seamlessly takes on about twenty keenly observed characters of different races, usually signalled with various woolly hats, to tell the story of one Harold Potgieter, whose rather disappointingly stereotyped ‘bitch-wife’ – later countered with some male-bonding – takes what the bank doesn’t repossess when his business fails. Now destitute and alone (he has no friends), he ends up boarding in a subdivided flat run by an Indian family. His adventures with the other classes begin. He joins a commuter taxi operation.

Shows like Hoot are exercises in the humour of recognisability. They may border unavoidably on stereotypes, though the fact that his characters are types seldom portrayed on our stages, keeps it fresh. What makes Hoot special is that it feels authentic. Employing snippets in African languages, Ribnick’s observations go beyond the impressions usually filtered through our rigidly stratified society by social osmosis. He has clearly spent much time hanging out with his subjects.

Both Chilli Boy and Hoot were written with Ribnick’s wife Geraldine Naidoo, who also directs his performance. Hoot is funny, broadly appealing and – as the enthusiastic response he has received shows – leads the charge in the daunting work that needs to be done to forge our fledgling democracy.

Philisa Sibeko as Musetta with Fikile Mvinjelwa as Marcello

Philisa Sibeko as Musetta with Fikile Mvinjelwa as Marcello


Dr Mamphela Ramphele, Cape Town Opera’s new torch-bearing patron, believes we can trump the Italians at their own art form if we innovatively infuse established conventional Western formats with local content. “Then we will be in the stratosphere,” she says.

The only cogent reason for transposing a work is to renew its currency and broaden audience appeal. We should certainly not be importing our directorial concepts, and stale ones at that. Shifting La Bohème from 1830s Paris to post-Nazi liberation is hackneyed even in the United States. The celebratory parade waving the Stars and Stripes felt bizarre and belonged to a remote time when Europe embraced Yankee regime change. I doubt the broader audience the CTO wants to reach would understand. Our own historical ‘Latin Quarter’ -Sophiatown – would have been perfect.

That said, the costumes and design are first-rate and suitably atmospheric, though the lighting – which is especially important in such a static opera – is perfunctory throughout.

Sure lyrical beauty makes it hard to go wrong with Puccini’s most loved, though almost plotless opera. Philisa Sibeko as Musetta the singer is the strongest in dramatic ability. The young band of Bohemians – who look more like bourgeois gentlemen – range from the powerful booming voices of baritone Fikile Mvinjelwa (Marcello, the painter) and bass Xolela Sixaba (Colline, the philosopher) – who draws applause for his rendering of the coat aria ‘Vecchia zimarra’, to the weaker baritone Gabuka Booi (Schaunard, the musician) – who does have a good stage presence though. Also soft are bass Marcus Desando (who doubles as Benoit the landlord and Alcindoro). Booi and Desando are often drowned out by the orchestra. The Cape Philharmonic play beautifully and excel under the baton of Francisco Bonnin.

In the leads Australian tenor Adrian Dwyer (Rodolfo) is tepid until the final act, while soprano Zanne Stapelberg rises to the occasion with her sensitive interpretation of Mimì’s many show-stopping arias – ‘Mi chiamano Mimì’, her third act farewell and the vitally important ‘Sono andati? Fingevo di dormire’.

I’m the last person to believe that local audiences won’t respond unless work is set in Africa and given indigenous spin, however the current production of La Bohème would have benefited from Ramphele’s advice.

Although unlikely to recur, I feel obliged to comment on one technical hitch: the surtitles – a luxury anyhow – went off in the second act. I hope the responsible technician was severely chastised – you simply cannot have that kind of thing going wrong on opening night.

Gaetan Schmid Beer Show

I originally saw Belgian theatre artist Gaetan Schmid perform his self-authored The Beer Show subtitled – the history of humankind seen through a beer glass – at the Obz Café. It was good then and has even tightened up since. It is now a neat, well-honed and well-target package. Chris Weare directs.

Schmid traces what is an obsession amongst his fellow nationals – beer (all in all there are probably a thousand different varieties in Belgium) from its origins in ancient Mesopotamia with his character Shôn the Sumerian who discovered the first brewing techniques; to the Pharaohs and Jesus; to Emperor Domitius, a power hungry Roman colonizer and his horse; the mad Benedictine monks in their laboratories; the Industrial Revolution; globalisation and the rise of the multinational corporations with the demise of beer through greed and carbonation; to today’s Underground Beer Revolution spearheaded by the microbrewery.

Schmid is a consummate clown steeped in the physical vocabulary of European performance. His subtle humour is eccentric, intelligent, yet easily accessible. Particularly heartening is his laissez faire approach to excess and in times where tolerance of religious intolerance threatens to reverse the progress man has made in his intellectual journey through history, Schmid’s impiety and post-Enlightenment irreverence is hugely welcome and refreshing.

The Incredible Beer Show remains a frothy ferment of imagination and distilled history.

Begeerte

When Eugene O’Neill wrote Desire Under the Elms (1924) – the story of a father and son pitted against each other, and the neurotic love between a young bride and her step-son that culminates in infanticide – he looked to the Greek legends of Medea and Oedipus. His character’s self-destructive, murderous passions and naïve declarations of undying love are today the stuff of melodrama rather than the ‘unflinching realism’ of rural life they were perceived as portraying to the New Yorkers of the 1920s. The play is still far less performed than say his Long Day’s Journey Into Night, as the kind of amour fou it depicts has been generally supplanted by a more cynical, if sensible approach to the vagaries of the human heart.

But along comes Nerina Ferreira’s seamless adaptation and masterful translation into accessible, yet poetic Afrikaans. She has (among various prudent changes) replaced the entire action of the first three and half scenes with a single monologue; she has reduced the cast of five and bit parts to only three; and she has transposed the setting from 1850s New England to a bleak remote platteland plaas where soliloquy and relentless melodramatic action seems natural amongst the stony ground and its isolated, obsessing characters. The melodrama is suddenly believable.

However, it seems the ossified Old Testament patriarch – embodied in Ephraim Cabot (Marius Weyers) – has been unseated both on and off stage in democratic South Africa. When he bursts into prayer immediately after coitus with “God forgive me”, belly laughs followed at his verkrampte double standards. Yet the archetype is still compelling.

Jan Ellis is outstanding as the smouldering caged male animal Eben, with all the sexual energy of a Brando, even if somewhat inauthentically costumed in trendy jeans and white vest that strengthens the reference. It is good to see this fine actor back on the Cape Town stage after a considerable absense.

Anna-Mart van der Merwe, one of our keurigste actresses is an inspired choice as the backveld Abbie. She has been praised for her wonderful make-over as a ‘slut’, presumably because she seduces both father and son. But this is of course a radically male chauvinist construction and a hopeless misreading of both O’Neill and van der Merwe’s performance. She is a passionate woman in terrible circumstances, who is prepared to do anything, including sacrificing her only chance at material gain, for nothing but love. Van der Merwe succeeds in a similar way Sophia Loren did in her Hollywood debut in the same role in Delbert Mann’s 1957-film version. Incidentally, Anthony Perkins – who played opposite her as Eben – gave one of his best film performances, before he became typecast.

Janice Honeyman’s direction is stark and uninhibited. On opening (and I was told on the preview nights as well) the audience became nervous and coy. Whereas hick middle America was scandalised by the moral outrages of O’Niell’s ‘morbid plumbing’, our apparently sophisticated urbanites of today received the nudity and sexual explicitness of Begeerte with immature giggles.

It is an excellent production – thanks to strong performances and Ferreira’s exceptional dramaturgy. As a result O’Niell’s work has been given a renewed lease and Begeerte has the feel of a play belonging to the bekroonde Afrikaans canon.

As one of the few practicing contemporary South African playwrights able to construct morally complex and dramatically layered scripts dealing with highly controversial socio-political topics, Mike van Graan’s latest Some Mothers’ Sons is highly recommended.

In the telescoped space of two prison visits, two men – Vusi and Braam – confront their differences: first in apartheid South Africa, where Vusi is a detainee undergoing torture and Braam a leftward leaning human rights lawyer-activist; then under the new democratic dispensation where multiple murders end in a reversal of their situation.

At a time when the numbness towards human life leads criminals to kill as easily as their victims find it to howl for the death penalty, Van Graan’s informed approach makes this two-hander essential viewing.

As a dramatist, he has a knack for creating predicaments that allow him to wring out every ambivalence, shade, contradiction and aporia in his focus. The engine of his theatre is clearly issue driven and he manipulates character and fate to explore these.

Although strong on theme, when compared to his other works, it lacks the dramatic bite of Green Man Flashing or the riskiness of Hostile Takeover. The problem is its all too perfect symmetry – two equal halves, two equally matched characters. This encourages a soft spot in Van Graan’s theatre as dialectic. At times, it feels like a debate with dramatic trimmings – even though it is complex, layered and the situations themselves are riveting. Stronger performances would have helped overcome this. Dumisani-Sizwe Mbebe all but eclipses Gideon van Eeden.

Interestingly, patrons are divided – Some Mothers’ Sons is seen as a closet pro-death penalty piece or as unambiguously probing from the opposite premise. As a play, it seems to allow us to draw our own conclusions, rather than empowering us with dramatic epiphanies.